Archive for Nutrition

Like many people, I enjoy the occasional drink but unfortunately alcohol and losing weight are opposites. So starting yesterday, I’m going dry for the next month, which is going to be tough as I really enjoy my Friday night beers and the occasional dose of absinthe.

Most alcoholic beverages are high in sugar which is something us weight lossers try to avoid but that’s not the worst of it when it comes to drinking. Alcohol inhibits your body’s ability to burn calories, meaning a couple of beers with dinner actually raises the effective number of calories you’ve just eaten.

Also, as Dr Brian Wansink notes in Mindless Eating, consuming alcohol inhibits both your memory of how much you have eaten and the signals to your brain that you are full. So really, a few beers or wines with a meal is a triple whammy for calories: you will likely overeat, the drinks are high in sugar, and they cause you to burn fewer calories than normal.

There is of course the added bonus of saving a bit of money, alcohol is expensive, especially when you like craft beers or extremely high alcohol spirits containing psychoactive chemicals. But for at least the next month, that won’t be a problem for me.

Three simple rules for a better diet from food author Michael Pollan, whose book In Defense of Food I am now extremely keen to read. Pollan has been an outspoken critic of US food policy and points out that the Western diet, the one we have invented for ourselves, is the only one which makes us sick.

The first rule, eat food, seems pretty obvious but what Pollan is getting at here is to avoid “edible food-like substances”. He cites the American example of the Twinkie, but you don’t have to look too hard in Kiwi supermarkets to find things like fruit flavoured “strings” and the like. Even some fruit drinks (not fruit juice, there is a distinction) can often contain nothing but water, sugar, flavouring and colouring, absolutely no nutrition there.

His second rule, not too much, is one that is largely ignored by most of us. How much is a serving of meat for dinner? Around 100g per person, and trust me, when you see that much on your plate your first thought will be, “where’s the rest?”

I was keeping a food diary a couple of weeks ago and was initially pleased with my results until one fateful Wednesday evening. I cooked up some delicious crumbed chicken, but noticed there were three  pieces in the pack and I was cooking for two. Instead of doing the sensible thing and leaving one in the fridge, or even cooking it to eat for lunch the next day, I ate two and gave one to my wife. This sent me way over my recommended daily calorie intake and left me feeling bloated and over full. I just didn’t need to eat it.

Another interesting piece of information around this rule comes from the book Mindless Eating by Brian Wansink who is a consumer behaviourist. He claims that we are full 10 minutes before our brain tells us that we are, leading many of us to overeat. As Wansink is a behavourist he focuses very much on the why we eat, rather than what we eat which makes him a very interesting read.

The mostly plants rule really boils down to something we all should know, fill up on vegetables, not meat. Vegetables, or fruit for that matter, contain a great deal of the nutrition that we need and very little of what we don’t. The great philosopher Frank Zappa once said, “There are two things in life you can never have too much of: Sex and vegetables.”

Pollan also warns against what he calls “nutritionism” — an ideology that’s lost track of the science on which it was based. Many people think that food is a delivery mechanism for nutrients where really it’s the other way around.

In An Apple a Day, author Joe Schwarcz discusses an interesting study about the anti cancer effects of the nutrient lycopene. Lycopene was discovered to be effective at fighting prostate cancer and as a result of this research, lycopene supplements began to appear on the market. Researchers at The Ohio State University conducted a study on rats who were fed either lycopene supplements or tomato extract, a food high in lycopene. What they discovered was that while lycopene did reduce the risk of prostate cancer, the tomato extract was 40% more effective, suggesting that other chemicals in the tomato also play a role.

This heathy eating this isn’t nearly as tough as it seems. Most of us know the rules and either choose to ignore them, or convince ourselves that a few slip ups here and there aren’t really a big deal. But really, when it’s summed up in just seven words it’s pretty hard to ignore. Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.

These days we’re told by television commercials that drinking the “sports drink” of your choice will enhance your performance as you train or play sports which has led many of us to to mistakenly believe that these drinks are a healthy choice. But what’s actually in these drinks? And what can they do for the weekend warrior?

When we exercise we sweat, and losing fluids inhibits our performance in any form of activity, from walking to weight training. In fact, during and after exercising rehydration is very important, with the simplest rule being keep drinking until you pee. But are these sports drinks better than good old H2O?

Sweat contains more than water, we also lose salt (NaCl or sodium chloride) and other trace minerals including potassium, calcium, and magnesium. Some of these, including sodium and potassium, are very important in all manner of biochemical reaction, for example sodium and potassium ions are important for nerve conduction.

However, while we lose these minerals, most of us don’t exercise enough to lose so much that we need immediate replacement. If training for a marathon and running for more than three hours you can lose so much sodium that hyponatremia is possible, and in that case a sports drink is ideal, but for those of us mere mortals training for shorter periods of time, water is just fine.

What many of us often forget about sports drinks is they contain quite a few calories, which offset the calories burned during exercise. For example, my last run of 7.7km burned 2650kJ after which I drank 750mL of fluid. Had that been Powerade Isotonic, I would have put 986kJ back into my system. Had I chosen Mizone Hypotonic it would have been 485kJ, either choice negates roughly 20% of my run, or 1.5km.

The other reason people often give for preferring sports drinks to water is a lack of stiffness the next day. Personally I always found that my legs were less stiff the following day if I drank sports drinks over water, but that’s hardly a scientific study.

Just a word on scientific studies of sports drinks, always look where they are carried out. The study cited in Powerade commercials was conducted at the NSW Institute of Sport, so was almost certainly carried out with elite athletes who were in the peak of physical condition, not weekend warriors trying to shed a few excess kg.

I’ll leave you with my sports drink of choice, Nuun. I find I’m not stiff the next day, recover quicker, and it tastes good, all with just 50kJ for 750mL.